
The incident began at 04:00 on Wednesday, March 28, 1979, with errors in the system of non-nuclear, followed by a pilot valve stuck open exploited (PORV) in the primary system that allowed large amounts of liquid the reactor coolant to escape. Mechanical failures have been exacerbated by the initial failure of plant operators to recognize the situation as a loss of coolant accident because of lack of training and human factors, such as industrial design flaw with ambiguous indicators of power plant control room interface. The scale and complexity of the accident became clear over the past five days, employees of the Metropolitan Edison (Met Ed, utility plant operations), officials of the State of Pennsylvania and Members of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has tried to understand the situation problem communicating to the press and the community, that the accident required an emergency evacuation, and, finally, to end the crisis.
In the end, the reactor was brought under control, although details of the 'incident was not discovered until much later, after extensive investigations and the President of the Commission and the NRC. Kemeny Commission report says that there is no case of cancer or the number of cases is so small that it will never be able to detect them. The same conclusion applies to other possible health effects. "Several epidemiological studies have years after the accident concluded that the emission of radiation from the accident had no significant effect on the incidence of cancer in residents near the plant, although these results are not contested by an investigator.
Public reaction to the event was probably influenced by the movie The China Syndrome 12 days before the accident, which happens to see an accident at a nuclear reactor. Posts by officials in the initial phases of the accident was considered incident crystallized confusing.The security concerns among anti-nuclear activists and the general public, has resulted in new rules for the nuclear industry and has been mentioned as a contributor to the decline in the construction of new reactors, which was already underway in the 1970s
No comments:
Post a Comment